Subject: RE: [xsl] validation definition From: "Sai, Mukundan (IE10)" <Sai.Mukundan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 23:35:47 -0700 |
no it cannot be validated .. cos it must have a dtd .. at the most we can say is its well formed or not rgds mukund > -----Original Message----- > From: Adam Claridge [SMTP:yafnaro@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 12:06 PM > To: XSL-List@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [xsl] validation definition > > hi all, > > very new to xsl/xml and a short question here. > > if a document contains no dtd, is it valid, invalid or not > validatable? that is, if there is nothing for it to validate against, > can it be said to be valid/invalid? > > cheers, > > adam > -- > <adam_claridge> > <+61_08_8223_2288> > <http://www.va.com.au> > <mailto:yafnaro@xxxxxxxxx> > <http://www.yafnaro.va.com.au> > </adam_claridge> > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] XForms processor, cknell | Thread | [xsl] validation definition, Adam Claridge |
[xsl] XForms processor, cknell | Date | [xsl] validation definition, Adam Claridge |
Month |