Subject: RE: [xsl] Generating variable DOCTYPE From: Cams Ismael <Ismael.Cams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 15:30:56 +0100 |
Thanks Danny, I will keep this in mind. But at this point the solution with the d-o-e will fullfill my requests. For all the other people who helped me with this topic, thanks for the provided help. Kind regards, Ismaël -----Original Message----- From: Yates, Danny (ANTS) [mailto:danny.yates@xxxxxxxxxx] Sent: donderdag 16 januari 2003 15:24 To: 'xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' Subject: RE: [xsl] Generating variable DOCTYPE Unless anybody has anything to add, I would suggest this is correct. The key point here is that you are serialising via a character stream. If at any future point you are likely to send the result direct to a SAX handler or an in-memory DOM tree, you will not get the result you expect! Check out the FAQ and archives for lots of reasons why d-o-e is bad. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Generating variable DOCTY, Yates, Danny (ANTS) | Thread | [xsl] XSL-FO : flowing text around , phdrix |
RE: [xsl] Generating variable DOCTY, Yates, Danny (ANTS) | Date | RE: [xsl] [XPath] matching elements, Michael Kay |
Month |