Subject: Re: [xsl] top level params and xsl:attribute magic? From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 14:39:54 -0500 |
Cheers, Wendell
"S Woodside" <sbwoodside@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:7FCB3007-2B28-11D7-8385-000393414368@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Thanks, I considered this, but I think that passing the full XPath > makes debugging easier and will be more robust if I change the source
> XML (it has a chance of still working, instead of being guaranteed not > to work. >
This is not so at all, the
(count(ancestor::node()), count(preceding::node()) )
uid will still identify the same node if the changes in the xml document were made in the descendants or following nodes of this node....
====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] top level params and xsl:, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | Re: [xsl] top level params and xsl:, S Woodside |
Re: [xsl] accessing attributes from, Oleg Tkachenko | Date | RE: [xsl] Number error with XALAN, Michael Kay |
Month |