Subject: Re: [xsl] Max size? From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@xxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 21:56:53 +0100 |
In the longer term I'm sure we will see XSLT processors that access XML databases natively rather than relying on the input tree being in primary memory: this is one reason why the synergy between XSLT and XQuery is so important.
Your note raises the interesting perspective that in some years OS might use mixed XML/RDBMS natively instead of a classic file system for storing all kinds of information, in particular mail, documents, spreadsheets and presentations.
What opportunities would arise from this? Would the benefits outweight the cost?
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Max size?, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] Max size?, Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] xsl filters pipeline agai, cknell | Date | RE: [xsl] Max size?, Martinez, Brian |
Month |