Re: XSL frustration (was: Re: [xsl] N : M transformation)

Subject: Re: XSL frustration (was: Re: [xsl] N : M transformation)
From: S Woodside <sbwoodside@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 15:59:18 -0500
That's cool, I'll wait for the standard. For now I'm in luck, libXSLT supports exsl:document

simon

On Friday, January 31, 2003, at 04:57 AM, Tobias Reif wrote:

It's your decision if you prefer reliance on drafts or on extensions, but the XSLT 2.0 syntax will become "standard" (part of a W3C XSLT rec) AFAICS.

---
www.simonwoodside.com


XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list



Current Thread