Subject: Re: [xsl] New to XSL - invalid token error From: Francis Norton <francis@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 23:54:19 +0000 |
Recent drafts of XQuery are closer to real XML syntax. You now writeI'm way out of touch, it's all there on the site. I'm still looking at it. Does it mean that an XQuery statement is essentially a well-formed mixed-content XML fragment? I bet I'm not the only one who's noticed that the sometimes puzzling distinction in XSLT between the root *node* and the root *element* means that XSLT would need no formal changes to accept (multiple root-element) XML Fragments as input instead of (single root-element) XML Documents, if only the underlying parsers would parse them.
return <book authorCount="{ count($authors) }"/>
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] New to XSL - invalid toke, Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] Blank line with XSL-FO, Mukul |
[xsl] Problem reading root element , Chris Libby | Date | Re: [xsl] Converting excel columns/, Irina Simpson |
Month |