RE: [xsl] The Perils of Sudden Type-Safety in XPath 2.0

Subject: RE: [xsl] The Perils of Sudden Type-Safety in XPath 2.0
From: "bryan" <bry@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 19:44:05 +0100
>Now if you have a schema specified but you do not want the xslt
>processor to pay attention to it, you will probably be out of luck, as
>best I can tell from recent posts on this.

Right. I suppose one of the ugly workarounds we will see in the future
will involve a dom (or other type of processable xml) to be processed
through a schema, and a dom to be processed through an xslt, even though
both doms are in fact loading the same xml.

Does this seem like a good guess?


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread