Subject: Re: [xsl] XSL-FO versus PostScript From: David Tolpin <dvd@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 23:39:20 +0400 (AMT) |
> > On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 05:54:22PM -0800, W. Eliot Kimber wrote: > > Yes--on the EXSLFO list I've discussed several possible low-cost > > solutions to this limitation, > > Do you mean the FOP-dev list or something else? If something else, can > you give subscription information? Google doesn't seem to know about it. http://exslfo.sourceforge.net/ The EXSLFO project is a community effort to define functional extensions to the XSL Formatting Objects specification in advance of development of new versions of the XSL FO specification by the W3C. It is intended to be an adjunct to the formal W3C specification development process. It is modeled on the existing EXSLT activity (http://exslt.org/). XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSL-FO versus PostScript, W. Eliot Kimber | Thread | RE: [xsl] Select entire XML doc, Dhiraj Torane |
Re: [xsl] XSL-FO versus PostScript, W. Eliot Kimber | Date | RE: [xsl] Re: Matching in two docum, Marty McKeever |
Month |