Subject: RE: the future (was RE: [xsl] Locating Things Relative to Location of Style Sheet) From: "bryan" <bry@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 10:08:07 +0100 |
Well I'd have to go back to discussions going on about that time but if I remember correctly there was a particularly angst-ridden thread about xpath 2.0, xslt 2.0, PSVIs and so forth at the time and the fear and loathing inspired me to a bit of levity, as it often does. -----Original Message----- From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andrew Watt Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 1:53 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: the future (was RE: [xsl] Locating Things Relative to Location of Style Sheet) At 17:40 06/12/2002 +0100, you wrote: >Good news everybody! > >I just asked the magic 8-ball Santa (http://www.santashaker.com/) if >xpath 2.0 will be widely adopted and he said "No" >He also said: "I'm Santa and I'm Frosty." So that may not be a good sign >though. Bryan, Did the esteemed Santa give any indication of why he had reached that conclusion about XPath 2.0? Andrew Watt XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: the future (was RE: [xsl] Locat, Andrew Watt | Thread | [xsl] How can i write header?, Rakesh |
Re: [xsl] Getiing Confused in Encod, Mike Brown | Date | [xsl] How can i write header?, Rakesh |
Month |