Subject: RE: [xsl] Differing behavior of Xalan and Saxon with namespaces. Who's right? From: "Passin, Tom" <tpassin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 16:32:37 -0500 |
[Niko Matsakis] [I said] > > Both Xalan and Saxon are correct. True, the Xalan output > declares an > > extra namespace, but the FitnessCenter element does not > belong to that > > namespace. So the presence of the declaration has no effect on the > > interpretation of the document. > > > Not strictly true. Depending on how the FitnessCenter element was > created (literal result element vs xsl:element vs xsl:copy) the XSLT > processor is obliged to copy over different sets of namespace > bindings; I forgot to say that I assumed that Roger had used a literal result element in the stylesheet (since he told us nothing about the source document). I apologise for not saying that clearly. In either case, though, the two documents are equivalent since the FitnessCenter element is in no namespace either way. Cheers, Tom P XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Differing behavior of Xal, Roger L. Costello | Thread | Re: [xsl] Differing behavior of Xal, Niko Matsakis |
Re: [xsl] Differing behavior of Xal, Roger L. Costello | Date | RE: [xsl] Differing behavior of Xal, Passin, Tom |
Month |