Subject: Re: [xsl] questions about XSLT philosophy: how much is too much? From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 12:05:12 -0500 |
There are two parts to this. First, there are things that are reasonable uses for XSLT. Some are hard right now, but solutions will be added to XSLT 2.0 -- grouping, regular expressions and date handling are examples. Some other things can be done, but will always be a little difficult. Then again, there are things that XSLT will never do well. Yesterday's thread about converting Cobol (or maybe Cobol Data) to XML probably goes in that category.
Cheers, Wendell
====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] questions about XSLT phil, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: [xsl] questions about XSLT phil, Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] include css in xsl, Passin, Tom | Date | Re: [xsl] Adding structure to text , Wendell Piez |
Month |