Subject: RE: [xsl] performance when using document() function From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 13:19:31 +0100 |
The document() function will incur the cost of reading and parsing the source XML and allocating memory to the resulting tree. This will almost certainly be done once only during a transformation, if the same URL is processed repeatedly. The only performance problems I'm aware of are when you need to process hundreds documents, in which case you can run out of memory. Michael Kay Software AG home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > Stevenson Ngila > Sent: 01 April 2003 10:38 > To: Xsl-List@Lists. Mulberrytech. Com > Subject: [xsl] performance when using document() function > > > Does anyone know what the performance consequences are > when using the document() function? > > Tips on improving performance are welcome. > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] performance when using do, Oleg Tkachenko | Thread | RE: [xsl] performance when using do, Rod Humphris - FLPTN |
Re: [xsl] Referencing original root, David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] XPath & generate-id, Michael Kay |
Month |