Subject: Re: [xsl] xslt2 grouping From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 14:29:02 +0100 |
> I can understand dp's point, when reading section 14 > http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/#grouping of the spec it does give the > impression that @group-by removes duplicates (instead of accessing them > through current-group()). If I was Mike (which I'm not;-) I wouldn't know which bit to change given this comment. I just read that section and it says (in the third para) Each item in the population is assigned to exactly one group: the assignment of items to groups depends on the group-by, group-adjacent, group-starting-with, and group-ending-with attributes. This seems to me to be fairly explicit that each item ends up in exactly one group, so in particular no items are removed, but section 14 is a fairly long section so perhaps it's less clear later on? David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] xslt2 grouping, Andrew Welch | Thread | RE: [xsl] xslt2 grouping, Andrew Welch |
[xsl] Parse CDATA content, Lopez, William | Date | RE: [xsl] why doesn't 'self::NODE' , Passin, Tom |
Month |