Subject: [xsl] Re: Re: Grouping problem? From: "Dimitre Novatchev" <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 06:52:43 +0200 |
"Lars Huttar" <lars_huttar@xxxxxxx> wrote in message news:002601c3091b$efc26f90$250414ac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Dimitre Novatchev wrote: > > Unfortunately, this does not produce the right result in the > > general case. > > I believe it does in the example data you gave, at least > as I understand Benjamin's definition of the problem. Hmmm... Probably I misunderstood the definition of the problem -- I thought that the sum in every group should not exceed 10. If this was a wrong understanding, it was a lucky one, as it describes a grouping problem, which does not have an obvious solution using the Muenchian method -- the groups are not independent, but every group depends on all previous groups. The original problem is much mor "regular" and it must be possible to solve using the scanl() function. ===== Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev. http://fxsl.sourceforge.net/ -- the home of FXSL XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Re: Grouping problem?, Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] preceding sibling headaches, Paul Tremblay |
[xsl] Re: CDATA output, Nathan Shaw | Date | [xsl] Re: Re: Grouping problem?, Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |