Subject: RE: [xsl] document() access. The combinations From: David.Pawson@xxxxxxxxxxx Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 12:04:22 +0100 |
> Saxon uses the Java URL class for resolving URLs. This has some > limitations, for example it doesn't seem to be able to handle Windows > networked filenames. I'm moving to the JDK 1.4 java.net.URI > class which > seems to do a better job; you can try this yourself with > Saxon 6.5.2 if > you like by writing your own URIResolver. I added the path to a sun resolver xml catalog, and still failed Mike. I guess I'm bumping into the java security blanket? error was Recoverable error Failure reading file://church/data3/users/dpawson/uriIncl.xml: Connection refused: Perhaps its not Saxon? regards DaveP - NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your system. RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] document() access. The co, J.Pietschmann | Thread | RE: [xsl] document() access. The co, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] WG: frames?, Markus Spath | Date | AW: [xsl] WG: frames?, Anton Wardaschko (PA |
Month |