Subject: RE: RE: [xsl] Documenting XML schema: a schema-to-XHTML stylesheet? From: cknell@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 12:00:01 -0500 |
Kurt Göedel lives! -- Charles Knell cknell@xxxxxxxxxx - email -----Original Message----- From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 21:17:26 +0100 To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: "'Ronan Danno'" <ronan.danno@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: RE: [xsl] Documenting XML schema: a schema-to-XHTML stylesheet? > Argh... I've just found out that one of the XML document > types that I'd planned to document (by writing an XDR schema, > and then using XSLT to produce documentation in XHTML) cannot > be fully expressed in either XDR or XSD I think it is very rare to find that all the constraints on the validity of a realistic document type (even considering only the internal constraints) can be expressed in the form of a grammar. If you can do this for your other document types, then I suspect there are constraints that you haven't captured. Michael Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Documenting XML schema: a, Conal Tuohy | Thread | [xsl] problems with xslt on "open" , Hayk, Matthias |
Re: AW: [xsl] WG: frames?, Markus Spath | Date | RE: [xsl] document() access. The co, Américo Albuquerque |
Month |