Subject: Re: [xsl] document() access. The combinations From: Bart Schuller <schuller+xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 13:34:01 +0200 |
On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 11:25:43AM +0100, David.Pawson@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > This is the full list at the moment. > Docbook table format. > Which other processors are popular? I'd like to see a column that tells what a close reading of http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt says should happen. Otherwise people will just look for the notation that works best, however broken it may be according to the URI spec. -- Bart. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] document() access. The co, David . Pawson | Thread | Re: [xsl] document() access. The co, David Carlisle |
RE: [xsl] document() access. The co, David . Pawson | Date | Re: [xsl] document() access. The co, David Carlisle |
Month |