Subject: Re: [xsl] document() access. The combinations From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 12:57:20 +0100 |
Dave, I think you should split your table up into examples of incorrect URI and examples of correct ones, having them all mixed up confuses the issue. Also you ask Which other processors are popular? > <entry>Saxon 6.5.2</entry> <entry>Microsoft V4</entry> <entry>Xalan</entry> <entry>LibXML 10029</entry> At least for the Java ones I wouldn't have expected this to be (directly) XSLT processor specific but rather a feature of the URI resolver used by the XML parser used by the XSLT processor. Clearly any given XSLT processor will have some default, but actual behaviour may well depend on several other factors, which JVM is being used, which sax/XML parser is being used, etc. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] document() access. The co, Bart Schuller | Thread | RE: [xsl] document() access. The co, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] document() access. The co, Bart Schuller | Date | RE: [xsl] document() access. The co, David . Pawson |
Month |