Subject: Re: [xsl] Comparison of XSL and XSLTC From: Kevin Jones <kjones@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 12:31:36 +0100 |
We have a general XSLT benchmark that we use for comparing processor performance (see www.sarvega.com). On XalanJ 2.5D1 it indicates XSLTC is roughly x3 the performance of XalanJ. The results are very uniform probably indicating this is a fairly good estimate for most stylesheet types. Kev. On Thursday 15 May 2003 09:01, Dennis wrote: > Hi All, > > Is there any benchmark analysis pertaining to XML > transformation between XSL and XSLTC (Translets) > supported by Apache. > Means who gives the better performance in terms of > transformation usage of XSL or XSLTC. > A comparative analysis for both will help a lot > > Thanks in Advance > -Dennis > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. > http://search.yahoo.com > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Comparison of XSL and XSLTC, Dennis | Thread | Re: [xsl] Comparison of XSL and XSL, Jarkko Moilanen |
RE: [xsl] Sorting resulttree to mul, Jarno . Elovirta | Date | Re: [xsl] Comparison of XSL and XSL, Jarkko Moilanen |
Month |