Subject: RE: [xsl] DOM v/s JDOM From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 14:03:39 +0100 |
> I have read @ many places that JDOM is a replacement > of DOM and is much better in terms of performance > (parsing) and usage. > In our product we need to transform XML using XSL. Is > the JDOM a right choice > so on what merits do we decide to go for JDOM instead > of DOM??? Is there any analysis done by someone??? Most XSLT processors will accept input from a SAX source and this is generally much better than providing DOM or JDOM input. The XSLT processor will then build a tree in its own internal format, optimized for transformation. Michael Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] DOM v/s JDOM, Dennis | Thread | RE: [xsl] DOM v/s JDOM, Greg McCreath |
RE: [xsl] Using or ignoring Types i, Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] Comparison of XSL and XSL, Michael Kay |
Month |