Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: Re: Using XSL for a "world records" table From: Ryan Heise <rheise@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 19:01:13 +1000 |
On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 10:35:18AM +0200, Dimitre Novatchev wrote: > <xsl:value-of select="position() + count(/*/record[time < > current()/time])"/> This looks nifty. If you just use the count() idea, keys are not required: <xsl:for-each select="record"> <xsl:sort data-type="number" select="time"/> <xsl:apply-templates select="."> <xsl:with-param name="place" select="1 + count(/*/record[time < current()/time])"/> </xsl:apply-templates> </xsl:for-each> I also just figured out another approach that just uses keys and not count: <xsl:for-each select="record"> <xsl:if test="not(preceding-sibling::record/time = time)"> <xsl:apply-templates select="key('records-by-time', time)"> <xsl:with-param name="place" select="position()"/> </xsl:apply-templates> </xsl:if> </xsl:for-each> I don't know which way is best, though. I guess whichever way runs the fastest :-) Thanks! Ryan XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Re: Re: Using XSL for a "worl, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | [xsl] Re: Re: Re: Using XSL for a ", Dimitre Novatchev |
[xsl] Re: Re: Using XSL for a "worl, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | [xsl] Re: Re: Re: Using XSL for a ", Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |