Subject: RE: [xsl] table column From: "Zarella Rendon" <zarella@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 11:02:31 -0500 |
There's always a way to get around using d-o-e: <xsl:template match="item"> <xsl:if test="position() mod 2 > 0"> <tr> <td> <xsl:apply-templates /> </td> <td> <xsl:value-of select="following-sibling::item[1]" /> </td> </tr> </xsl:if> </xsl:template> Zarella Rendon Principal Consultant XML Factor Consulting Svcs. www.xml-factor.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of David Neary Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 10:06 AM To: 'xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' Subject: RE: [xsl] table column De : David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@xxxxxxxxx] > > <xsl:text disable-output-escaping="yes"></tr></xsl:text> > disable-output-escaping is almost always the wrong thing to do and is > specified as being non-portable. It is useful as a method of producing > non xml output like <% ... or dealing with over-use CDATA section > sections in the input document, but it isn't needed here. I understood that to produce well-formed xml in situations where start and end tags are conditional, disable-output-escaping (or xsl:output mode="html") were required. If I leave it off, the output will be <tr> will it not? Cheers, Dave. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] table column, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: [xsl] table column, David Neary |
Re: [xsl] table column, David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] table column, David Neary |
Month |