Subject: RE: [xsl] document() function. From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 12:09:46 +0100 |
> I think that if you are looking for reasons for this you > should ask why document() wasn't in xpath1. I suspect the historical reason is that XPointer didn't want it. Michael Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] document() function., David Carlisle | Thread | RE: [xsl] document() function., Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] document() function., Michael Kay | Date | [xsl] Re: XSL-List Digest V4 #1219, Kathrin Compostella |
Month |