[xsl] redundancy in string(number(current())) = 'NaN' ??

Subject: [xsl] redundancy in string(number(current())) = 'NaN' ??
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 16:38:17 -0400 (EDT)
  just poring over Kay's book, filling in the gaps, and in the
section for xsl:message, there's an example that's selecting:


just to make sure, i'm assuming the "current()" part is 
redundant, since number() will use the string-value of the
context node if there is no argument.  do i understand
that correctly?

  if so, i assume that that was just put in for aesthetics.



Robert P. J. Day
Eno River Technologies
Unix, Linux and Open Source training
Waterloo, Ontario


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread