Subject: RE: RE: [xsl] grouping by unique... From: Chris Loschen <loschen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 12:43:24 -0400 |
[ Michael Kay]
> > To my esteemed British correspondents: Could you please > > explain why the English name "Featherstone" is pronounced "Fanshaw"? > > I think you mean "Featherstonehaugh". > > If you were called that, how would you pronounce it? > > I don't know the explanation in this case. With place names, the usual > reason for a disconnect between the spelling and the pronunciation is > that the spelling evolved among those who could read and write, the > pronunciation among those who couldn't. >
Well. here is the US in the state of Massachusetts, we have the city of Worcester, pronounced more or less as "Wooster". I have always assumed that that would be the pronuciation in England, too, but I have never heard it spoken by someone from there.
Cheers,
Tom P
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: RE: [xsl] grouping by unique..., Vasu Chakkera | Thread | [xsl] Stop off-topic discussion ple, Mulberry Technologie |
Re: RE: [xsl] grouping by unique..., Vasu Chakkera | Date | [xsl] Fw: omitting empty elements w, Venkat Gyambavantha |
Month |