|
Subject: RE: [xsl] xsl:sort in old MSXML From: "Claudio Russo" <crusso@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 09:43:14 -0300 |
Wendell, Sorry but I didn't get this one (maybe it's further my english knowledge). What's "the former"? Claudio. -----Original Message----- From: Wendell Piez [mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Martes, 01 de Julio de 2003 06:08 p.m. To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: [xsl] xsl:sort in old MSXML Oops! I meant "the former", of course. :-> At 03:27 PM 7/1/2003, you wrote: >If you mean "descriptive" markup vs. "procedural" markup ... XML can be >used for either, though it's particularly well-suited to the latter. ====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ====================================================================== XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] xsl:sort in old MSXML, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: [xsl] xsl:sort in old MSXML, Claudio Russo |
| RE: [xsl] xsl:sort in old MSXML, Claudio Russo | Date | RE: [xsl] xsl:sort in old MSXML, Claudio Russo |
| Month |