RE: [xsl] xsl:sort in old MSXML

["Jim Fuller" <jim.fuller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

i think u confuse my discussion

saxon is just an XSLT processor implementation, it fully adheres to the XSLT 1.0 standard, and also implements XSLT 2.0 if u choose to use it. it is open standard, as for running on the client machine, it is obvious from your questions that a book combined with 'rubber on the road' experience will answer these 1st order questions.

cheers, jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Claudio Russo [mailto:crusso@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 02 July 2003 14:06
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [xsl] xsl:sort in old MSXML
> 
> 
> Jim,
> 
> Thanks for your replay.
> 
> But this will tie me up with a specific technology instead of 
> begin adhering straight to standards and open tech. For sure 
> this technology is one step ahead of the standard but unless 
> is a standard by itself (which I doubt from the msgs coming 
> to this list), will be difficult to see applications running 
> smoothly in, lets say, at least 90% of the clients machines.
> 
> As I said, I've been playing a little bit (for sure not as 
> much as you did guys) with the XML/XSLT technology and is 
> time to wrap up and take in concern what I mention before, 
> being able to deploy a site with minor environment problems, 
> inmediate adherance to standards and simple maintenance.
> 
> Claudio.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Fuller [mailto:jim.fuller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Miércoles, 02 de Julio de 2003 06:20 a.m.
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [xsl] xsl:sort in old MSXML
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Claudio Russo [mailto:crusso@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> 
> I would suggest that you just download saxon ( 
> saxon.sourecforge.net ) and go through as many examples as 
> possible, the architectural view will emerge with this 
> intimate experience, deal with the axiomatic idiom of 
> xml+xslt->xml parsing first, then layer from there....yes I 
> know, if its hard to explain....then why....sometimes just 
> doing is the quickest route between 2 points.
> 
> there are many 'grand' visions e.g. the architectural 
> viewpoint you ask for, it depends on whom you are asking;for 
> example those ( no offense ) older SGML'ers out there will no 
> doubt have a document centric viewpoint ...or corba/dcom folk 
> will no doubt be nodding their heads saying ahhhh SOA. 
> 
> One thing is certain, that xml and derived markups such as 
> XSLT are an agent of change affecting said architectures.
> 
> gl, jim fuller
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are 
> confidential and intended solely for the use of the 
> individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are 
> not the intended recipient please contact the sender 
> immediately. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or any 
> other use of this communication is strictly prohibitedand may 
> be unlawful. Stuart Lawrence Marketing Communications Limited 
> reserves the right to monitor and intercept communications 
> for unlawful business purposes.
> 
> This also confirms that this message has been swept for 
> viruses, although Stuart Lawrence Marketing Communications 
> Limited accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage 
> resulting directly or indirectly from the use of this email 
> or contents.
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> 
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> 
> 

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list