Subject: RE: [xsl] xsl:sort in old MSXML From: "Claudio Russo" <crusso@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 12:21:18 -0300 |
Yes I agree on the last... -----Original Message----- From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Miércoles, 02 de Julio de 2003 11:28 a.m. To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xsl] xsl:sort in old MSXML >>> I would suggest that you just download saxo >But this will tie me up with a specific technology i Not at all. Saxon is one of the most conformant XSLT implementations. As with any XSLT system, it has some extensions but stylesheets have to explictly declare they are using those. If you want to test out a standard XSLT transformation, saxon is as good a choice as any. > I doubt from the msgs coming to this list), will be difficult to see > applications running smoothly in, lets say, at least 90% of the clients > machines. You still seem to be very confused of the relationship between an XSLT processor and a client browser. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] xsl:sort in old MSXML, Claudio Russo | Thread | RE: [xsl] xsl:sort in old MSXML, Jim Fuller |
RE: [xsl] if statement, David Neary | Date | RE: [xsl] xsl:sort in old MSXML, Jim Fuller |
Month |