Subject: RE: [xsl] XSLT Architecture: Next Step From: "Claudio Russo" <crusso@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 11:44:23 -0300 |
David, Just a simple no? Please, as a guru on the matter, sustain in order to understand why not. ;-) Looking forward, Claudio. -----Original Message----- From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Jueves, 03 de Julio de 2003 10:39 a.m. To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT Architecture: Next Step > The question is (or are): Do you share these views? No. The abstract of http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt says what XSLT is intended to be used for, cooking isn't mentioned. All the uses of XSLT that have been mentioned in the threads you have started are clearly within the scope of the language as defined there. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XSLT Architecture: Next S, Claudio Russo | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT Architecture: Next S, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] specific template?, Martin Klaffenboeck | Date | Re: [xsl] specific template?, Jeni Tennison |
Month |