Subject: Re: [xsl] Precedence of template rules on xsl:import From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 13:14:26 +0100 |
Marcus, David C. wrote: >> so I want that the order of the imports shouldn't matter. > perhaps you want xsl:include not xsl:import. I was just writing the same thing. The other thing I noticed in the toolbar.xslt was that rather than: <xsl:template match="button[parent::toolbar or parent::group/parent::toolbar]"> ... </xsl:template> it would be a lot neater to write, and easier to understand: <xsl:template match="toolbar/button | toolbar/group/button"> ... </xsl:template> Cheers, Jeni --- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Precedence of template ru, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] Precedence of template ru, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] Precedence of template ru, David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] Re: Re: XSLT Architecture, Claudio Russo |
Month |