Subject: RE: [xsl] Re: Re: XSLT Architecture: Next Step From: "Claudio Russo" <crusso@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 13:47:48 -0300 |
Rob, yeah, also data transformations, but that's not a business elementary process (IEM speaking). Claudio. -----Original Message----- From: Rob Rohan [mailto:me@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Viernes, 04 de Julio de 2003 12:57 p.m. To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: [xsl] Re: Re: XSLT Architecture: Next Step On Fri, 2003-07-04 at 06:19, Claudio Russo wrote: > David, > > I agree with you, which comes back to my first expression. Why don't keep > XSLT for what it was created, presentation purposes (as Michael recalled > from the w3c sentence), and leave the process in the server level with more > specific elementary process programming under C, Java, Assy, compiled language, > giving the necessary XML view for the XSLT. Claudio, you can use XSLT just for presentation and live a long healthy life. No one will mock you. Feel free. However, I do so enjoy taking a semi-large document, running it through an XSLT process to get a smaller sub-set of data then using it via DOM in java. I think this is elegant way to keep the DOM small. There are also a myriad of ways to use XSLT that don't tread on the Assembly, Java, or C ground. I think the world should just throw away hammers because if you take a screw driver and use the butt end, you can hammer in nails if you try really hard. Cheers, Rob -- Rob Rohan <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Re: Re: XSLT Architecture, Rob Rohan | Thread | RE: [xsl] Re: Re: XSLT Architecture, Rob Rohan |
[xsl] [OT] Javascript help, Wendell Piez | Date | RE: [xsl] Re: Re: XSLT Architecture, Rob Rohan |
Month |