Subject: RE: [xsl] XSLT Architecture: Next Step From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2003 13:01:45 -0400 |
Didier Says...
<As you know, XML is not a language per se but more a set of rules used to created languages. The main advantage is that these produced languages share a common syntax and therefore some generic tools can be used for an entire family of languages. One of these generic tool is XSLT. >
Actually XML is very much a language; i.e., it has a well defined set of terminal symbols and a grammar describing which strings are acceptable as strings of the language. Obviously there are a number of parsers out there that utilize this language definition in order to parse these strings.
Cheers, Wendell
___&&__&_&___&_&__&&&__&_&__&__&&____&&_&___&__&_&&_____&__&__&&_____&_&&_ "Thus I make my own use of the telegraph, without consulting the directors, like the sparrows, which I perceive use it extensively for a perch." -- Thoreau
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XSLT Architecture: Next S, Didier PH Martin | Thread | [xsl] Generated code is not working, jan . soer |
RE: [xsl] Re: Re: XSLT Architecture, Rob Rohan | Date | RE: [xsl] node() problem, Michael Kay |
Month |