Subject: [xsl] Re: Re: Re: XSLT Architecture: Next Step From: "Dimitre Novatchev" <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 20:57:30 +0200 |
"Claudio Russo" <crusso@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:C795D31002324444B1D95D8940C8A78F0BECA4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Dimitre, > > So, this library, somehow replaces any/some/all of the extensions provided by MSXML, XALAN, SAXON, and other interpreters? FXSL doesn't replace anything -- it just fills an existing gap in the traditional ways of applying XSLT. This gap is called higher order functions and/or functional programming. Probably if HOF were part of the language from the very start there would have been much less extension functions developed, but this is not how XSLT evolved. The ideas lying behind FXSL are still considered heretic by some people. > Meaning that is pure XSLT 2.0, the interpreters that stack to XSLT 1.0 wouldn't be capable of run them? Until recently it was on the contrary -- it was possible to "run FXSL" only on XSLT 1.0. Then I adapted it (with some very few and minot changes) so that it produced the correct results in XSLT 2.0. ===== Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev. http://fxsl.sourceforge.net/ -- the home of FXSL XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Re: Re: XSLT Architecture, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: [xsl] Re: Re: XSLT Architecture, Claudio Russo |
[xsl] Re: Re: Re: XSLT Architecture, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | [xsl] file exists?, Martin Klaffenboeck |
Month |