Subject: RE: Is XML a Language? (was RE: [xsl] XSLT Architecture: Next Step) From: "bryan" <bry@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 09:52:37 +0200 |
>So, if I may substitute noun for noun, adjective for adjective, what you're >saying is equivalent to: >If a brown cat has to possess all the normally defined qualities of a 'cat' >whatever these are, then yes a 'brown cat' is a cat. Grue and bleen, Bill. >This of course is a tautology. A meta language IS a language. That's why >it's not called a meta frobitz! That may be why it is not called a meta frobitz, and it is an acknowledged naming pattern that object y which is derived from object x also has a name containing within it the name of object x, nonetheless this in no way indicates that any object which contains within its name the name of object x is certain to be derived from object x. Note that object in this case is not just in reference to an object as defined in OOP terms. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Is XML a Language? (was RE: [xs, Bill Cohagan | Thread | [xsl] an Xpath question - $tag/$sub, Anil |
[xsl] Parsing two XML files at the , Vivek Shinde | Date | RE: [xsl] an Xpath question - $tag/, Michael Kay |
Month |