Subject: RE: [xsl] Microsoft.XMLDOM UTF-8 Encoding! From: Rob Rohan <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 11 Jul 2003 23:56:55 -0700 |
Jezz, don't sugar coat it Julian - just come right out with it. I hope you don't talk to you significant other that way :-/ Cheers On Fri, 2003-07-11 at 23:41, Julian Reschke wrote: > > I am going way out here, so please swat me down if I am wrong. If I > > remember correctly the first byte of a file will tell if it is (really) > > utf-8 or iso-8859-1 encoded. You can say its utf-8 in the declaration, > > Wrong. > > > but if the file is saved with an editor that is only capable of saving > > in iso-8859-1 format, the first byte of the file will say so (something > > about bit order I believe). What you could be running into is a file > > No. The BOM (Byte Order Mark) is *optional* in UTF-8. > > > that truly is iso-8859-1 (or utf-16 etc) encoded saying its utf-8 - and > > whatever process you are using to read the xml file doesn't buy what you > > are saying. > > Correct. > > > ... -- XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Microsoft.XMLDOM UTF-8 E, Julian Reschke | Thread | Re: [xsl] Microsoft.XMLDOM UTF-8 E, Daniel Bibbens |
RE: [xsl] Microsoft.XMLDOM UTF-8 E, Julian Reschke | Date | RE: [xsl] Microsoft.XMLDOM UTF-8 E, Julian Reschke |
Month |