Re: [xsl] Re: [meta] why post? [was] CSS

[David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>]

Mike Haarman says that Mike Brown  wrote

> point. It seemed like an innocuous suggestion, to me, since even if I had not
> correctly guessed what the original poster meant, making the suggestion
> to use xsl:comment to generate comments was sure to benefit *somebody*.
> It's becoming an increasingly rare event when I feel like helping anyone on
> this list anymore.

although it hasn't reached here yet (so i'm not sure of the full context
of the quote)

Sorry if my followup caused offence.

I think after a week of threads on getting data out or putting data in
to CDATA sections, I felt moved to comment adversely on a suggestion to
hide some more document content:-) Probably my email was too terse (not
for the first time...)


David

________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list