Subject: Re: AW: AW: [xsl] why is "(chapter//footnote)[1]" illegal? From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 16:01:17 -0400 (EDT) |
On Sat, 23 Aug 2003, Markus Abt wrote: > > ---------- > > Von: Robert P. J. Day > > > > (chapter/para)[1] yes (kay, 408) > > (chapter//footnote)[1] no (kay, 443) > > ($chapters//diagram)[1] yes (kay, 355) > > (chapter/para)[1] no > (chapter//footnote)[1] no > ($chapters//diagram)[1] no > > All three can not be used as patterns. ok, i finally twigged on what i was confused about. duh. it was a late night, i was just being dense. sorry. rday XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
AW: AW: [xsl] why is "(chapter//foo, Markus Abt | Thread | [xsl] XSL extensions and namespaces, Scott Powell |
Re: [xsl] Re: EXSL's dyn:evaluate(), raphead | Date | AW: AW: [xsl] why is "(chapter//foo, Markus Abt |
Month |