Subject: Re: Passing element nodes through string functions (WAS RE: [xsl] Preserving inline elements when using string functions) From: Brook Ellingwood <brook@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 11:18:55 -0700 |
> Using keys for grouping is known as "muenchian grouping" in hono(u)r of > Steve Muench who thought of it (Jen's fault for coinng the phrase I > believe) You can use the Queen's English with me -- I have a built in translate($UKjargon, $weirdSpelling, $USjargon) function. I've done some simple stuff with Mr. Muench's marvelous method in the past, but complicating it with the mixed nodes pushes it past my current comprehension level. >> Is the output that I have shown what you expect? > yes (except for the first blank 1 line which may be a bug in my code, > or it may be that your uinput really started with a linebreak? It may be picking up the linebreak between the parent <page> element and the child <bodytext> element...? No matter, as it doesn't affect the displayed output. Thanks for the solution (and thanks to Bill also for his excellent description and solution). I wasn't too far off in getting the recursion right -- at one point I had it outputting the proper number of nodes, but each one repeated the content of the first node. This is tricky stuff, for sure. -- Brook XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Passing element nodes through s, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: Passing element nodes through s, Bill Keese |
Re: [xsl] how many TraX-XSLT-proces, Burghard Güther | Date | AW: [xsl] how to get node with maxi, Markus Abt |
Month |