Subject: RE: [xsl] Re: Relation between Memory /Time Problem and OS ?? From: Dipesh Khakhkhar <dkhakhkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 11:58:21 -0400 |
Hi, Thanks for replying. Even if msxsl is showing 0 milliseconds for loading xml document of 6 MB and 0 milliseconds for exeucting it, it is taking long time to complete the process and give the output. The only reason for this which i guess now is the priority of this process and the number of processes running on the server. And on top of this i know my algorithim is inefficient, now i am curious to find out with the same algorithm which all parameters comes into picture to get the actual performance. So as Kevin pointed out, some way of benchmarking the performance must be deployed, so i think doing that I would come out with some concrete reasons. I will also try to make that process with highest priority and then check its performance. Thanks for replying and throwing lights on this issue. Regards, Dipesh > What I mean is: > The only process taking more time was the loading of the stylesheet, but there are other factors to take into account: i.e. transfer-rate of the hard drive, the number of processes running on both computers (probably more processes on the server, which could explain why it took slightly longer to load the stylesheet as well as the fact that it didn't seem to return as quickly... the operation might have already been finished, while there were still processes running with a higher priority) XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Re: Relation between Memo, Kevin Jones | Thread | [xsl] Replacing double quotes with , James Paul |
RE: [xsl] Re: Relation between Memo, Andreas L. Delmelle | Date | Re: [xsl] Identity Transform, Abie Hamaoui |
Month |