Re: [xsl] Re: topological sort

Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: topological sort
From: Bill Keese <billk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 16:31:04 +0900
Hmm, interesting. I guess that both approaches are based on the idea of
"levels", where

level 1 = nodes w/no dependencies
level 2 = nodes that depend on level 1 (only)
level 3 = nodes that depend on level 2 (and maybe also level 1)
level 4 = nodes that depend on level 3 (and maybe also levels 1 or 2)

With the solution I suggested I think you could get a stable sort by
specifying a secondary sort key on position().

Bill

Dimitre Novatchev wrote:

>See also:
>
>  http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/xsl-list/955081
>
>and
>
>  http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/xsl-list/956248
>  
>


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread