Subject: Re: [xsl] Notes on Comparison of XSL FO Renderers From: Tokushige Kobayashi <koba@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 08:45:53 +0900 |
I reviewed again the performance comparison report, in summary: 1. FOP is fastest within the three processors when base 14 fonts or type1 font are specified. 2. FOP is slowest when characters are in English, TTF font specifed and embed. 3. IF CJK fonts are specifed, FOP is always the slowest. Performance result of FOP heavily depends on font format. Best regards, Tokushige Kobayasahi > reply ro the mail > From:David Tolpin <dvd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Dated: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 13:25:52 +0500 (AMST) > Subject: [xsl] Notes on Comparison of XSL FO Renderers There are other implementations, and they are also worth including into the list. I would just like to see correct comparison in speed and feature, not just a batch run on a RenderX Sample (which cannot be run through FOP, by the way -- the FASTEST of processors listed - just because it does not have support for shortands, which, in turn, are not required for basic conformance). Sincerely, David Tolpin http://davidashen.net/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list Tokushige Kobayashi Antenna House, Inc. E-mail koba@xxxxxxxxxxxxx WWW http://www.antenna.co.jp/ WWW http://www.antennahouse.com/ (English) TEL +81-3-3234-1361(direct call) FAX +81-3-3221-9975 Antenna House XSL School http://www.antenna.co.jp/XML/school/xslday.htm XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Notes on Comparison of XS, Kobayashi | Thread | Re: [xsl] Notes on Comparison of XS, Tokushige Kobayashi |
[xsl] Encoding while parsing, Pramodh Peddi | Date | Re: [xsl] Notes on Comparison of XS, Tokushige Kobayashi |
Month |