RE: [xsl] Introducing a comma.

Subject: RE: [xsl] Introducing a comma.
From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 15:12:29 -0500
At 02:46 PM 11/18/2003, Charles wrote:
<xsl:if test="name() = 'in' and following-sibling::*[name()= 'in']">,</xsl:if>

A more direct and more robust way of expressing this test would be:


<xsl:if test="self::in and following-sibling::in">,</xsl:if>

or even (okay, you may wonder what's the point)

<xsl:if test="self::in/following-sibling::in">,</xsl:if>

Cheers,
Wendell


====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================


XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list



Current Thread