RE: [xsl] Problem with position( ) function

["Jaime A Stuardo Bahamondes" <jstuardo@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

yes.. the problem I had is that always the xsl received a nodeset containing all nodes.... inside the template I was filtering what nodes to include and what not. That's why I had problems with comparison position() with last()

Jaime

> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]En nombre de David
> Carlisle
> Enviado el: Lunes, 01 de Diciembre de 2003 9:47
> Para: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Asunto: Re: [xsl] Problem with position( ) function
> 
> 
> 
>   Thanks.. but the problem I have is that condition "position() <
>   last()" doesn't work because position() gets the position 
> of the last
>   node in the XML, and not of the last node with the same agr_id. 
> 
> position() _never_ relates to a position in the original 
> tree. It always
> refers to a position in the current node list. If that 
> current node list
> consists of nodes with a particular ACT_AGR_ID as in the example code
> posted, then position() will equal last() on the last of those nodes.
> 
> David
> 
> 
> -- 
> http://www.dcarlisle.demon.co.uk/matthew
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> __________
> This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
> service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
> anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
> http://www.star.net.uk
> ______________________________________________________________
> __________
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> 
> 

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list