Subject: [xsl] Re: Easy way to identify node type? From: yguaba@xxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 11:37:59 -0200 |
Ken, Thanks for the words of caution; I shall bear that in mind from now on. Have a great weekend, Erik On 6 Dec 2003 at 17:53, G. Ken Holman wrote: > At 2003-12-05 17:24 -0200, yguaba@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >Actually, I don't want to match specific elements (I could do that > >with <xsl:when test="local-name() = 'element_1' or local-name() = > >'element_2 or local-name() = 'element_n''"> > > That isn't namespace safe. > > > or just simply write > >different templates for each different element). > > That is namespace safe. > > Using the self:: access is also namespace safe and is far better than > using the name() functions. The name functions are appropriate for > exposition but are not appropriate for most node testing purposes. > > I hope this helps. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Re: Easy way to identify node, yguaba | Thread | RE: [xsl] Re: How to Calculate Runn, Ficke, Bill |
[xsl] increasing variable?, chris poppe | Date | Re: [xsl] attributes and elements, Bruce D'Arcus |
Month |