Subject: Re: [xsl] Missing nodes are ruining my sort !!!! From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 16:39:36 GMT |
I think <xsl:sort select="/RESULTS/DATA/INSTANCE [AREAID=current()/@areaid and VARIABLEID=1]/VALUE" data-type="number" order="ascending"/> sorts by your first variable, but as I say, "" sorts low so it comes first (this is more or less the same xpath you use lower down except written a bit more efficiently (// is expensive) and using current() rather than variables as the vars are not defined at this point. To sort "" high the easiest thing is to just negate the values and invert the order: <xsl:sort select="-1 *(/RESULTS/DATA/INSTANCE [AREAID=current()/@areaid and VARIABLEID=1]/VALUE)" data-type="number" order="descending"/> -- http://www.dcarlisle.demon.co.uk/matthew ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Missing nodes are ruining, Rupert Howell | Thread | [xsl] Announce: Hands-on XSL traini, G. Ken Holman |
RE: [xsl] Unbounded element groupin, Gupta, Raman K [CI] | Date | [xsl] Accessing variable with compu, Christian Roth |
Month |