Subject: RE: [xsl] Continue seqlist numbering|
From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 14:08:56 -0500
I said: > >Anyway, this is another ideal situation for building the > structure you > >want in a variable first, and then operating on that (which > has been in > >many other posts today).
Ken replied: > But not with pure XSLT 1.0 ... only with extensions or XSLT > 2.0 ... in pure > XSLT 1.0 there is no access to a variable for XPath or XSLT > processing.
Isn't this just a technicality these days
Didn't early 6.5.x versions of Saxon even treat RTF's as node-sets automatically? I'm not saying your wrong, I'm just saying do we really need to point it out every time in every reply for fear of being picked up on it?
-- North America (Washington, DC): 3-day XSLT/2-day XSL-FO 2004-02-09 Instructor-led on-site corporate, government & user group training for XSLT and XSL-FO world-wide: please contact us for the details
G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/ Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0 +1(613)489-0999 (F:-0995) ISBN 0-13-065196-6 Definitive XSLT and XPath ISBN 0-13-140374-5 Definitive XSL-FO ISBN 1-894049-08-X Practical Transformation Using XSLT and XPath ISBN 1-894049-11-X Practical Formatting Using XSL-FO Member of the XML Guild of Practitioners: http://XMLGuild.info Male Breast Cancer Awareness http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/bc