Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: nearly FAQ .. (numbering of elements) From: "Agnes Kielen" <agnes.kielen@xxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 19:44:11 +0100 |
Hi, > On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 04:13:19PM +0100, > Kielen, Agnes <Agnes.Kielen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote > > > Use the position() function http://www.dpawson.co.uk/xsl/sect2/N6099.html. > > Which will work only if all the elements are "interesting", i.e. must > be counted. I prefer Andrew Welch's solution. > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > It depends what is more important the sequence in the source or the sequence in the result. When you're interested in the sequence in the result position() is the right choice. xsl:number is the rigth choice when you're interested in the source. Anyhow xsl:number can cost a lot of performance. Cheers, Agnes XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Re: nearly FAQ .. (numbering , Stephane Bortzmeyer | Thread | RE: [xsl] nearly FAQ .. (numbering , Andrew Welch |
RE: [xsl] Re: Displaying XSLT XML , Mike Spencer | Date | RE: [xsl] Grouping in XSL, Amuchastegui, Maria |
Month |