Subject: Re: [xsl] Empty object From: "Mike Haarman" <mhaarman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 16:04:16 -0600 |
But my first priority is to get into my > transformed output. Why!? http://mail.gnome.org/archives/xml/2003-June/msg00099.html http://sources.redhat.com/ml/xsl-list/2001-11/msg00782.html > <xsl:text>&nbsp;</xsl:text> when transformed still places &nbsp; > into my output when viewed with a browser. Because you didn't add the attribute disable-output-escaping="yes" to the xsl:text node. You did not read the FAQ or you would know that and also why you don't want to do that. > What am I doing wrong? You're not doing your reading and you're not listening. http://www.dpawson.co.uk/xsl/sect2/nbsp.html#d6216e236 If your PHB is demanding an entity reference in the output of your transformation, get him to post and we'll put him straight too. Mike XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Empty object, scott gabelhart | Thread | Re: [xsl] Empty object, scott gabelhart |
Re: [xsl] Empty object, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] Empty object, Wendell Piez |
Month |