Subject: Re: [xsl] libxslt version changes RTF or exsl node-set sorting behavior From: David Tolpin <dvd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 03:31:54 +0400 (AMT) |
> > I think I did made my views known at the right time and in the > right places, i.e. where that made sense. I think I also complained > to Sharon and you at the time when Saxon used liberally RVT as > node-set inputs. > Would not it be logical then not to support exsl:node-set() in libxslt? Instead of declaring it supported when in fact it is not due to implementation problems? David Tolpin http://davidashen.net/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] libxslt version changes R, Daniel Veillard | Thread | [xsl] Evaluate function, Richard Light |
Re: [xsl] libxslt version changes R, Daniel Veillard | Date | |
Month |