Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl From: David Tolpin <dvd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 19:09:41 +0400 (AMT) |
> > The most obvious diff is that XSLT has tags but Python/Perl hasn't. I > suspect if you tried to write a SCCM system in XSLT, I wouldn't rate yr > chances for understandability, or even of surviving very long as a sane > person. > I asked you the wrong thing. Now, why is having tags advantageous? What are the tasks for which XSLT 2.0 provides better layer separation, more clear syntax, faster completion, better code maintainence? For XSLT 1.0 the theory (at least) is that it is simple enough to be efficient in implementing algorithms it is used to specify. It has very few things it should not; and as soon as the scope is narrowed, it is the best tool. XSLT 2.0 is awk with pointy brackets. What's the advantage of having pointy brackets in awk? David Tolpin http://davidashen.net/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, roger . day | Thread | RE: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] How to strip out a pair o, cknell | Date | RE: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, Christopher Hearns |
Month |